The world is looking at alternatives to Facebook. The commercial companies are (Google+), the large open organisations are (Browser ID - sort of), and lots of open source solutions.
My solution will depend on an Open and Distributed standard.
Open standard vs Open source
To be an open standard, you really need multiple implementations. Many organisations will not allow a standard to be released unless there are multiple to demonstrate that.
It is much easier to write an open source application to do social networking than a distributed one. And it is much easier to write a distributed application than an open standard.
This is pretty self explanatory. The main requirement here is to allow someone to run their own node, or host it with someone else, even commercially. I now have my email hosted commercially, after running it myself for 18 years. Fortunately email is easy to do so. It is a commodity, I can move it any time. I can even move it to another hosting company running the same software (same features) or a different set (different software). And it is smooth to do so. I can change the file formats, the back end, the software running it, everything. This is what we need for social networking
What it is
What is social networking. Or rather, what do I want to do?
Share private (mostly static) information
- Facts about me:
- Phone number
- Email address
- Meta facts about me:
- Work history
Share private discussions
Selectively share media (optional discussions)
Community Databases (e.g. Game Scores)
- Arbitrary groupings of people: Friends, Family, Glider Pilots
- Associations: OSDC, Melbourne Perl Mongers, Gliding Club of Victoria, French Island Community Association ...
- Association with an individual: Worked with; Went to school with ...
TODO - ability to have gateways to other network sites - taking my open and choosing to publish it on a Facebook page, or Google +. Partly this saves time: aggregation. Partly this give more control: Privacy.
My issue list. Some of these may not be an issue, but I need to investigate to understand.
Security on where you are stored
Email does not have any security, but you can be pretty sure that when you email someone it does go to the right place. This is because we trust DNS (not getting into nitty gritty here, but generally true).
Using Diaspora as an example: I can store my seed in any pod, and I can move them to other pods. So if I just start up a rogue pod, and take someones identity? Needs to be considered. Maybe already done?
This one is vague, but one example might be "LIKE" - if I "LIKE" this web page, I get to see how many people like this page. Which POD do I ask? How is it distributed?